AI brand visibility starts with your own facts

You cannot edit an assistant’s answer about your brand. You can decide whether your own site is a usable source for it, and most brands currently are not.

Scan a URL freeNo account, no card. You get the score and the fix list.

Your business

Products, services and policies

What is missing

Details a customer needs

A clearer answer

Information you can publish

Conversion lift, AI-referred visitors vs search
~38%
Cyber Week 2025 retail data
Content negotiation vs llms.txt, accurate retrieval
~4.2x
300k-domain study, mid-2026

Where an answer about your brand comes from

When an assistant describes your company, it is composing from whatever it retrieved and whatever it absorbed in training. Some of that is your site, some is directories and marketplaces, some is coverage and forums. You own the first outright, influence the second, and do not control the rest.

That distribution is why the useful move is not chasing mentions. It is making sure the one source with your name on the door is complete, current and readable, so that when it is retrieved it settles the question rather than adding to the confusion.

Brand facts have to agree with themselves

The single most common brand-visibility defect we see in scans is disagreement inside one page: the visible text says one thing and the structured data says another. An assistant picks one, and you do not get a say in which.

  • Name and legal entity. One canonical spelling, everywhere, including the markup.
  • Contact and location. Present in the text a parser sees, not only in a widget that loads after JavaScript.
  • What you sell and to whom. Stated plainly near the top rather than implied by a hero image.
  • Terms that change. Prices, availability, eligibility, hours. Injected from your source of truth so they cannot go stale independently.

None of this is generated on your behalf. The gateway prints values you already store, and the validator rejects a variant containing a number that did not come from a source field, which is what keeps a fluent summary from quietly inventing your pricing.

What a brand can honestly report

Three of these are measurements of your own infrastructure and hold up in a board deck. The fourth is a sample, and should be labelled as one.

MetricWhere it comes fromHow solid
Readability score per templateA published, deterministic specExact and reproducible
Agent fetches by platformYour own request logExact, it is your server
Answer rate and the miss logRequests you served against ones you did notExact
Mentions in assistant answersSampled promptsIndicative only, never a guarantee

What this does not do

Frequently asked questions

What is AI brand visibility?

How readily AI assistants can find and correctly state facts about your brand. The controllable part is whether your own site is a complete, current and machine-readable source; the uncontrollable part is which sources any given assistant happens to draw on.

How do I improve how AI describes my brand?

Make your own pages answer the questions people ask about you, put those facts near the top, ensure the prose and the structured data agree, and make sure the fetch is not blocked. That is the whole of the part you own.

Can I stop an assistant saying something wrong about us?

Not directly, and anyone selling that is overpromising. What you can do is remove the ambiguity that produced it, by making the authoritative version cheap to retrieve and impossible to misread. Correcting the source is the only lever that exists.

Do we need a brand monitoring tool for this?

Monitoring tells you the outcome; it does not change it. Start by fixing whether your pages can be read at all, because a brand that fails that check will not be helped by watching the results more closely.